Since we were having such a great time discussing the incomprehensible, we pondered this question: "What are some flaws with the thinking that creation can be explained by incorporating evolution?" ie. Some people will say that the six days are not literal days, but figurative, and as such can represent the billions of years necessary for evolution.
Some points that came up:
After each day of creation, God saw what He had made, and it was good. ie. there was not yet sin, and as we know "the wages of sin is death". Evolution, however requires death. The question then arose, is this death speaking of a spiritual death, because only humans can sin? And if so, would "death" in this sense, not apply to animals? But then why would God specifically list the fish, birds, animals, and eventually Adam and Eve as being "created"?
We then talked about why global warming is such a crisis for evolutionists. Essentially, if a person believes the world is several billion years old, with a relatively constant environment, and suddenly sees that environment change "drastically" over a decade or so, that would be cause for alarm. If however, you believe the world is only thousands of years old, with an environment that has already had drastic changes in it's short period of existence, then recent changes are not something to cause concern.
The question then arises, can man destroy the earth? The answer was a resounding NO. We can change it to a point that might make it uninhabitable, but we cannot destroy it. So you might ask yourself what is the true root of environmentalists concerns? Is it a concern for the environment, or is it a selfish concern for their own self-existence.
As Christians, we need to ask ourselves if we believe we can make the earth uninhabitable before God's timing, or is it God's plan for us to make it uninhabitable exactly according to his timing?
Lastly, we asked the age-old question "Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?"
Some points that came up:
After each day of creation, God saw what He had made, and it was good. ie. there was not yet sin, and as we know "the wages of sin is death". Evolution, however requires death. The question then arose, is this death speaking of a spiritual death, because only humans can sin? And if so, would "death" in this sense, not apply to animals? But then why would God specifically list the fish, birds, animals, and eventually Adam and Eve as being "created"?
We then talked about why global warming is such a crisis for evolutionists. Essentially, if a person believes the world is several billion years old, with a relatively constant environment, and suddenly sees that environment change "drastically" over a decade or so, that would be cause for alarm. If however, you believe the world is only thousands of years old, with an environment that has already had drastic changes in it's short period of existence, then recent changes are not something to cause concern.
The question then arises, can man destroy the earth? The answer was a resounding NO. We can change it to a point that might make it uninhabitable, but we cannot destroy it. So you might ask yourself what is the true root of environmentalists concerns? Is it a concern for the environment, or is it a selfish concern for their own self-existence.
As Christians, we need to ask ourselves if we believe we can make the earth uninhabitable before God's timing, or is it God's plan for us to make it uninhabitable exactly according to his timing?
Lastly, we asked the age-old question "Did Adam and Eve have belly buttons?"